News

Navigating the Medical Lien Obstacle

How Healthcare Claims Delay Settlement/Judgment Distribution

Date:
July 28, 2025
Author:
Roni Dersovitz, Esq.

If you are a plaintiff’s attorney who routinely deals with clients’ medical and other liens, you understand the financial strain it can place on your practice.  Lien resolution delays can hold up settlement/judgment distributions for months, extending the time for lawyers to collect their fees.

The scenario is frustratingly familiar: You have finally secured a favorable settlement, or settlement, years after intaking the case, but now face further delays to identify and resolve your client’s outstanding liens. Lien resolutions can easily add incremental payment delays of 4-7 months, sometimes even longer.

In personal injury cases, medical, Medicare and workers’ compensation liens are an all-too-common issue when plaintiffs receive medical treatment or other benefits during the pendency of a litigation. Unfortunately, lien negotiations and verifications routinely extend the payment timeline far beyond a settlement/judgment.  What should be the culmination of successful litigation instead becomes the beginning of another drawn-out administrative hurdle that can further strain law firm operations and client relationships.

The Three-Layered Challenge of Medical Lien Resolution

1. Private Provider Liens: The Negotiation Marathon

Negotiating liens requires precision to ensure that terms are fair and reasonable and represent the actual cost of the benefits provided, all the while increasing the costs of litigation and reducing the client’s award. With multiple collateral parties now involved, it can further delay distribution, impacting the cash flow of the client and law firm.

Private healthcare providers often bill at "chargemaster" rates that can be 3-4 times reasonable value. The challenge for attorneys is demonstrating that a $50,000 hospital bill for emergency treatment, as an example, may have a reasonable value of $15,000-$20,000 based on Medicare rates and regional standards. This negotiation process typically requires:

  • Verification Processes: Detailed medical records review to establish causation
  • Billing Review: Comparative analysis of billing rates and market standards
  • Negotiation Strategies: Multiple rounds of negotiations with provider representatives
  • Documentation Requirements: Documentation of settlement/judgment allocation between damages categories

Each provider operates independently, creating a complex web of individual negotiations that must be coordinated and resolved before final distribution can occur.

2. Medicare Complications: Government Bureaucracy at Its Peak

Plaintiffs on Medicare create another layer of complexity in awaiting distribution, as Medicare law dictates that medical costs associated with an injury be reimbursed before the settlement/judgment funds are distributed. For the law firm, this involves providing documentation, negotiating with plan administrators, and complying with regulatory deadlines and guidelines.

Law firms are often plagued by prolonged waiting periods for approvals and calculations, impacting operating cash flows as delays finalizing settlements/judgments create a drag on the timing of distributions.

The Medicare Secondary Payer Act creates a labyrinthine process that includes:

  • Conditional Payment Calculations: Conditional payment requests that can take 60-90 days for initial response
  • Compliance Deadlines: Detailed settlement reporting with strict 60-day deadlines
  • Set-Aside Considerations: Potential Medicare Set-Aside requirements for future medical expenses
  • Appeals: Processes that can extend timelines by additional months

Consider a slip-and-fall settlement involving a 67-year-old plaintiff. A $400,000 settlement might appear straightforward until Medicare's conditional payment calculation reveals $47,000 in related medical expenses. The final resolution can require months of back-and-forth documentation, appeals, and negotiations—during which the attorney's earned fees remained inaccessible.

3. Workers' Compensation: The Double-System Dilemma

Workers' compensation liens grant the insurer the right to be reimbursed from settlement/judgment proceeds. For the law firm, this creates additional time and resources to comply with these requirements, and oftentimes the distribution is held up until all legal and procedural hurdles are met.

When workplace injuries result in third-party liability claims, attorneys must navigate two distinct legal systems simultaneously. The workers' compensation carrier has already paid medical expenses and disability benefits, creating a lien against any third-party recovery. This scenario requires:

  • Multi-System Coordination: Coordination between tort and workers' compensation proceedings
  • State Law Variations: State-specific lien reduction calculations based on attorney fees and costs
  • Administrative Approvals: Approval from workers' compensation boards or administrative agencies
  • Damage Allocation: Allocation of settlement proceeds between economic and non-economic damages

The complexity multiplies when multiple medical providers, Medicare, and workers' compensation all have claims against the same settlement/judgment proceeds.

The Economics of Effective Lien Negotiation

Successful lien resolutions require sophisticated understanding of medical billing practices and strategic negotiation approaches:

1. Reasonable Value Analysis

Healthcare billing often reflects "chargemaster" rates that significantly exceed reasonable value for services provided. Effective lien negotiation requires:

  • Comparative Analysis: Comparison with Medicare reimbursement rates, which typically represent 30-40% of billed charges
  • Market Research: Evaluation of regional market rates for similar services and procedures
  • Causation Review: Assessment of medical necessity and causation related to the underlying incident
  • Settlement Allocation: Strategic allocation of damages between economic and non-economic categories

2. Negotiation Leverage Factors

Several key factors influence lien negotiation outcomes:

  • Total settlement/judgment amount and plaintiff's net recovery potential
  • Strength of medical causation evidence linking treatment to the incident
  • Provider's historical collection practices and policies

3. Procedural Complications That Create Delays

Documentation Requirements

Comprehensive lien resolution requires extensive documentation including:

  • Proof of benefits provided by medical providers and workers’ compensation carriers
  • Complete medical records and detailed billing statements
  • Proof of medical causation linking treatment to the underlying incident
  • Settlement/judgment details and damage allocation documentation relating to the allocation to economic and pain suffering injuries
  • Attorney fee and cost documentation for lien reduction calculations
  • Proper lien holder authorization and release forms

4. Multi-Party Coordination Challenges

Complex cases often involve multiple lien holders with competing interests:

  • Workers’ compensation carriers
  • Primary treating physicians and hospital systems
  • Specialist providers and rehabilitation facilities
  • Government healthcare programs with regulatory requirements
  • Private insurance carriers asserting subrogation rights
  • Pharmacy and medical equipment providers

Coordinating resolution with all parties requires careful timing and communication to avoid delays from individual lien holder scheduling or procedural requirements.

5. Administrative Processing Delays

Even after negotiated resolutions are reached, administrative processing can create additional delays:

  • Internal approval processes within large healthcare organizations
  • Workers’ compensation carrier related delays
  • Government agency review and approval procedures with fixed timelines
  • Final documentation preparation, execution, and notarization
  • Wire transfer processing and delivery procedures

The Financial Impact of Lien Delays on Law Firms

Lien resolution delays can negatively impact the duration of a distribution, adversely impacting litigators' financial health. While it can take years to reach a settlement or secure a judgment, the additional months required for lien resolution create compounding cash flow challenges that extend far beyond simple inconvenience.  Medical lien resolution delays create several significant financial challenges:

  • Extended Accounts Receivable: Settlement/judgment amounts remain uncollectible during lien resolution periods, impacting cash flow projections and operational planning.
  • Increased Administrative Costs: Lien negotiation requires significant attorney and staff time, increasing case costs without corresponding revenue recognition.
  • Client Relations Pressure: Clients awaiting settlement/judgment distributions may become frustrated with delays, requiring additional communication and management attention.
  • Opportunity Costs: Resources devoted to lien resolution cannot be deployed on new case development or business growth initiatives.

Strategic Approaches to Lien Management

The Strategic Solution: Post-Settlement/Judgment Funding

Post-settlement/judgment funding can provide the liquidity law firms need to manage cash flows during extended lien resolution periods. This financing approach recognizes that the most valuable assets law firms hold—their receivables or rights to future legal fees from settlements and judgments—are typically not recognized as collateral by traditional lenders.

Post-settlement/judgment funding solves liquidity issues by providing necessary capital against future receivables. This approach offers several critical advantages:

  • Immediate Cash Flow Relief: Firms can access a portion of earned fees immediately after a settlement or judgment, maintaining operational stability during extended lien negotiations without depleting reserves or compromising other business activities.
  • Enhance Negotiation Position: Remove financial pressure from lien negotiations, allowing attorneys to pursue optimal outcomes rather than expedited resolutions.
  • Preserve Growth Opportunities: Continue accepting new cases and investing in practice development without cash flow constraints.
  • Optimize Resource Allocation: Allow staff to focus on thorough lien resolution without pressure to compromise outcomes for speed.
  • Client Service Maintenance: Firms can maintain high-quality client service and communication without financial stress impacting attorney attention or availability.

Conclusion

Lien resolution represents a critical component of plaintiff side law practice that requires specialized knowledge, strategic planning, and sophisticated resource management. The complexity and duration of lien resolution processes create predictable challenges that can significantly impact both client outcomes and law firm operations.

Post-settlement/judgment funding provides a practical solution that enables firms to manage these challenges effectively while maintaining operational stability and client service excellence. The key is recognizing that lien delays are not exceptional circumstances but routine aspects of practice that require strategic planning and appropriate financial tools.

Law firms that master lien resolution while utilizing strategic financing solutions position themselves for sustained success in an increasingly complex legal environment, ensuring optimal outcomes for both clients and firm operations.

-----

Roni Dersovitz is the founder and CEO of RD Legal Funding, a pioneer in providing innovative liquidity solutions for contingency law firms. To learn more about strategic options for your practice, visit www.legalfunding.com or contact us at info@legalfunding.com or (800) 565-5177.

By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.